izk0fo0 nkÅniqj d0ua01 PS 64
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP366 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 366 | 54.55% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 214 | 31.89% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 49 | 7.30% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 21 | 3.13% | |
| 5 | Suryanath | AK | 10 | 1.49% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 671 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 366 | 53.98% | 1 | 60 | Strong |
| SP | 214 | 31.56% | 2 | 200 | Average |
| INC | 49 | 7.23% | 3 | 92 | Poor |
| BSP | 21 | 3.10% | 4 | 143 | Poor |
| AK | 10 | 1.47% | 5 | 1 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.03% | 6 | 123 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.29% | 7 | 126 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 112 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 98 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 168 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 334 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.