izk0fo0 pdnknj d0ua01 PS 59
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP157 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 157 | 43.85% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 152 | 42.46% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 23 | 6.42% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 17 | 4.75% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 4 | 1.12% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 2 | 0.56% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 358 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 157 | 43.49% | 1 | 320 | Strong |
| SP | 152 | 42.11% | 2 | 275 | Strong |
| BSP | 23 | 6.37% | 3 | 132 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 4.71% | 4 | 301 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 1.11% | 5 | 49 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.83% | 6 | 248 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.28% | 8 | 173 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.28% | 7 | 109 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 209 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 209 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 165 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.