izk0fo0 dksMjlcqtqxZ d0ua01 PS 57
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP502 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 502 | 62.36% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 161 | 20.00% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 59 | 7.33% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 56 | 6.96% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 8 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 5 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 4 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 4 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 3 | 0.37% | |
| 10 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 11 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 12 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 805 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 502 | 60.26% | 1 | 5 | Strong |
| SP | 161 | 19.33% | 2 | 263 | Weak |
| BSP | 59 | 7.08% | 3 | 35 | Poor |
| INC | 56 | 6.72% | 4 | 69 | Poor |
| IND | 17 | 2.04% | 5 | 15 | Poor |
| ABAD | 4 | 0.48% | 6 | 5 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.36% | 7 | 86 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.12% | 9 | 56 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.12% | 10 | 172 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.12% | 8 | 103 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 207 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.