izk0fo0 dkSokMhg d0ua01 PS 49
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP554 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 554 | 72.70% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 158 | 20.73% | |
| 3 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 13 | 1.71% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 10 | 1.31% | |
| 5 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 9 | 1.18% | |
| 6 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 6 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | Suryanath | AK | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 8 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 12 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 14 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 762 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 554 | 71.67% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| BJP | 158 | 20.44% | 2 | 319 | Weak |
| IND | 17 | 2.20% | 3 | 14 | Poor |
| BSP | 10 | 1.29% | 4 | 234 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.16% | 5 | 369 | Poor |
| JAP | 6 | 0.78% | 6 | 52 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.39% | 8 | 17 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.39% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 93 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 53 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 222 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.