izk0fo0 nkÅn uxj d0la02 PS 48
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP216 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 216 | 40.53% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 204 | 38.27% | |
| 3 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 53 | 9.94% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 39 | 7.32% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 5 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 8 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 14 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 533 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 216 | 39.93% | 1 | 243 | Average |
| SP | 204 | 37.71% | 2 | 210 | Average |
| JAP | 53 | 9.80% | 3 | 3 | Poor |
| INC | 39 | 7.21% | 4 | 148 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 2.22% | 5 | 45 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 0.74% | 6 | 316 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.37% | 7 | 15 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 98 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 92 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 233 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 221 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.