izk0fo0 Hkkao d0ua01 PS 395
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP291 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 291 | 47.55% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 195 | 31.86% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 58 | 9.48% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 57 | 9.31% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 6 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 7 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 612 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 291 | 47.24% | 1 | 116 | Strong |
| BJP | 195 | 31.66% | 2 | 274 | Average |
| INC | 58 | 9.42% | 3 | 67 | Poor |
| BSP | 57 | 9.25% | 4 | 39 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.49% | 5 | 288 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.49% | 6 | 117 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.32% | 7 | 90 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 183 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 176 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 127 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 403 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.