izk0fo0 lsejk d0ua01 PS 393
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP330 votes at this polling station
over Mo. Ashraf (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 330 | 54.19% | |
| 2 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 132 | 21.67% | |
| 3 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 98 | 16.09% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 32 | 5.25% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 9 | 1.48% | |
| 6 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 609 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 330 | 53.23% | 1 | 93 | Strong |
| BSP | 132 | 21.29% | 2 | 3 | Weak |
| SP | 98 | 15.81% | 3 | 354 | Weak |
| INC | 32 | 5.16% | 4 | 194 | Poor |
| JAP | 9 | 1.45% | 5 | 37 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.65% | 6 | 240 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.32% | 7 | 222 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 174 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 125 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 399 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 398 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.