izk0fo0 rkykxksikyiqj d0ua01 PS 392
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP377 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 377 | 51.64% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 260 | 35.62% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 32 | 4.38% | |
| 4 | Phoolchandra | CM | 32 | 4.38% | |
| 5 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 14 | 1.92% | |
| 6 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.14% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 730 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 377 | 50.95% | 1 | 47 | Strong |
| SP | 260 | 35.14% | 2 | 152 | Average |
| BSP | 32 | 4.32% | 3 | 100 | Poor |
| CM | 32 | 4.32% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| INC | 14 | 1.89% | 5 | 336 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.08% | 6 | 114 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.41% | 7 | 140 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 201 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 182 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 246 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 124 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.