izk0fo0 cUnjgk d0ua02 PS 384
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP366 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 366 | 67.03% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 100 | 18.32% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 41 | 7.51% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 10 | 1.83% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 6 | 1.10% | |
| 6 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 7 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 8 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 9 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 11 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 12 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.18% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 546 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 366 | 65.95% | 1 | 69 | Strong |
| BJP | 100 | 18.02% | 2 | 369 | Weak |
| BSP | 41 | 7.39% | 3 | 79 | Poor |
| IND | 17 | 3.06% | 4 | 17 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 1.80% | 5 | 364 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.90% | 6 | 40 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.36% | 7 | 87 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.36% | 8 | 43 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.18% | 11 | 243 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 180 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 172 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.