izk0fo0 dksjpUnkeÅ d0ua01 PS 365
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP139 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 139 | 32.40% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 121 | 28.21% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 103 | 24.01% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 22 | 5.13% | |
| 5 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 7 | 1.63% | |
| 6 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 7 | 1.63% | |
| 7 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 6 | 1.40% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 9 | Phoolchandra | CM | 4 | 0.93% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 11 | Raghvendra | HSP | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 12 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 13 | Suryanath | AK | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 14 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 3 | 0.70% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 429 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 139 | 31.81% | 1 | 344 | Average |
| SP | 121 | 27.69% | 2 | 322 | Average |
| BSP | 103 | 23.57% | 3 | 8 | Weak |
| IND | 25 | 5.72% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| INC | 22 | 5.03% | 5 | 272 | Poor |
| CM | 4 | 0.92% | 6 | 10 | Poor |
| HSP | 3 | 0.69% | 10 | 9 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.69% | 11 | 114 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.69% | 7 | 135 | Poor |
| ABAD | 3 | 0.69% | 8 | 35 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.69% | 9 | 32 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.