izk0fo0 ijekuiqj d0ua01 PS 364
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP410 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 410 | 64.77% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 128 | 20.22% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 52 | 8.21% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 28 | 4.42% | |
| 5 | Phoolchandra | CM | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 6 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 8 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 633 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 410 | 62.88% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| SP | 128 | 19.63% | 2 | 312 | Weak |
| BSP | 52 | 7.98% | 3 | 48 | Poor |
| INC | 28 | 4.29% | 4 | 230 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.77% | 5 | 203 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.46% | 7 | 113 | Poor |
| CM | 3 | 0.46% | 6 | 26 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.31% | 8 | 41 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 313 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 177 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 388 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.