iw0ek0fo0 estjxat d0ua02 PS 363
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP382 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 382 | 52.11% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 212 | 28.92% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 60 | 8.19% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 33 | 4.50% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 15 | 2.05% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 11 | 1.50% | |
| 7 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 9 | 1.23% | |
| 8 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 9 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 733 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 382 | 51.62% | 1 | 60 | Strong |
| BJP | 212 | 28.65% | 2 | 250 | Average |
| BSP | 60 | 8.11% | 3 | 34 | Poor |
| INC | 33 | 4.46% | 4 | 185 | Poor |
| IND | 19 | 2.57% | 5 | 10 | Poor |
| JAP | 15 | 2.03% | 6 | 16 | Poor |
| AAP | 9 | 1.22% | 7 | 4 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.27% | 8 | 85 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 176 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 388 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 379 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.