izk0fo0 ljka; nkew d0ua01 PS 351
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP173 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 173 | 38.02% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 134 | 29.45% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 82 | 18.02% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 49 | 10.77% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 4 | 0.88% | |
| 7 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | Phoolchandra | CM | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 11 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 455 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 173 | 37.28% | 1 | 244 | Average |
| BJP | 134 | 28.88% | 2 | 349 | Average |
| BSP | 82 | 17.67% | 3 | 18 | Weak |
| INC | 49 | 10.56% | 4 | 98 | Weak |
| IND | 9 | 1.94% | 5 | 90 | Poor |
| CM | 2 | 0.43% | 7 | 69 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.43% | 8 | 39 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.43% | 6 | 74 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 309 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.22% | 10 | 185 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 387 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.