tw0gk0 csykHksyk d0ua04 PS 341
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP272 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 272 | 63.85% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 77 | 18.08% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 40 | 9.39% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 14 | 3.29% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 7 | 1.64% | |
| 6 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 4 | 0.94% | |
| 7 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 8 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 10 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 426 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 272 | 63.26% | 1 | 136 | Strong |
| BJP | 77 | 17.91% | 2 | 383 | Weak |
| INC | 40 | 9.30% | 3 | 147 | Poor |
| BSP | 14 | 3.26% | 4 | 203 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 2.56% | 5 | 64 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.93% | 6 | 74 | Poor |
| ABAD | 3 | 0.70% | 7 | 32 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.70% | 8 | 109 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 112 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 168 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 381 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.