iw0ek0fo0 fl/kkSuk d0ua02 PS 34
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP459 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 459 | 62.45% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 204 | 27.76% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 36 | 4.90% | |
| 4 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 9 | 1.22% | |
| 5 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 6 | 0.82% | |
| 6 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 7 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 8 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 13 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 735 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 459 | 61.69% | 1 | 28 | Strong |
| BJP | 204 | 27.42% | 2 | 264 | Average |
| INC | 36 | 4.84% | 3 | 163 | Poor |
| IND | 19 | 2.55% | 4 | 7 | Poor |
| BSP | 5 | 0.67% | 5 | 303 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.54% | 6 | 46 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.40% | 7 | 90 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.27% | 8 | 40 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 12 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 105 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 193 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.