tw0gk0 csykHksyk d0ua02 PS 339
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP232 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 232 | 39.73% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 196 | 33.56% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 88 | 15.07% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 44 | 7.53% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 9 | 1.54% | |
| 6 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 7 | Phoolchandra | CM | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 8 | Suryanath | AK | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 9 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 10 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 11 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 584 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 232 | 39.59% | 1 | 224 | Average |
| SP | 196 | 33.45% | 2 | 222 | Average |
| INC | 88 | 15.02% | 3 | 20 | Weak |
| BSP | 44 | 7.51% | 4 | 67 | Poor |
| JAP | 9 | 1.54% | 5 | 34 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.51% | 7 | 30 | Poor |
| CM | 3 | 0.51% | 8 | 22 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.51% | 9 | 285 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.51% | 6 | 129 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.34% | 10 | 38 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 180 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.