d0izk0fo0 csykHksyk d0ua01 PS 336
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP308 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 308 | 41.62% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 263 | 35.54% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 80 | 10.81% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 53 | 7.16% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 7 | 0.95% | |
| 6 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 7 | 0.95% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | Phoolchandra | CM | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 12 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 14 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.27% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 740 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 308 | 40.96% | 1 | 121 | Strong |
| SP | 263 | 34.97% | 2 | 146 | Average |
| INC | 80 | 10.64% | 3 | 27 | Weak |
| BSP | 53 | 7.05% | 4 | 46 | Poor |
| IND | 19 | 2.53% | 5 | 9 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.40% | 10 | 108 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.40% | 6 | 128 | Poor |
| ABAD | 3 | 0.40% | 7 | 31 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.40% | 8 | 29 | Poor |
| CM | 3 | 0.40% | 9 | 20 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.27% | 11 | 37 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.