izk0fo0 uFkbZiqj d0ua01 PS 332
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP397 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 397 | 50.64% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 251 | 32.02% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 80 | 10.20% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 30 | 3.83% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 8 | 1.02% | |
| 6 | Phoolchandra | CM | 5 | 0.64% | |
| 7 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 5 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.38% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 12 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 784 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 397 | 50.32% | 1 | 48 | Strong |
| BJP | 251 | 31.81% | 2 | 200 | Average |
| BSP | 80 | 10.14% | 3 | 21 | Weak |
| INC | 30 | 3.80% | 4 | 210 | Poor |
| AAP | 8 | 1.01% | 5 | 9 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 0.76% | 6 | 171 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.63% | 8 | 68 | Poor |
| CM | 5 | 0.63% | 7 | 6 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 175 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 164 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 360 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.