izk0fo0 csan d0ua01 PS 330
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP262 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 262 | 52.09% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 171 | 34.00% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 40 | 7.95% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 10 | 1.99% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 4 | 0.80% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 4 | 0.80% | |
| 7 | Suryanath | AK | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 503 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 262 | 50.68% | 1 | 148 | Strong |
| BJP | 171 | 33.08% | 2 | 308 | Average |
| INC | 40 | 7.74% | 3 | 146 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 1.93% | 5 | 76 | Poor |
| BSP | 10 | 1.93% | 4 | 244 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.77% | 6 | 81 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.58% | 7 | 28 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 304 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 173 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 156 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.