izk0fo0 ,dkSuk d0ua01 PS 328
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP230 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 230 | 40.49% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 229 | 40.32% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 52 | 9.15% | |
| 4 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 22 | 3.87% | |
| 5 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 15 | 2.64% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 6 | 1.06% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 5 | 0.88% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 10 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 568 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 230 | 40.14% | 1 | 228 | Strong |
| SP | 229 | 39.97% | 2 | 179 | Average |
| INC | 52 | 9.08% | 3 | 88 | Poor |
| ABAD | 22 | 3.84% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| BSP | 15 | 2.62% | 5 | 195 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 2.62% | 6 | 25 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 206 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 107 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 232 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 163 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 374 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.