izk0fo0 csykVsdbZ d0ua02 PS 326
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP222 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 222 | 47.03% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 144 | 30.51% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 43 | 9.11% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 41 | 8.69% | |
| 5 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 6 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 7 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 2 | 0.42% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 14 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.21% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 472 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 222 | 47.03% | 1 | 187 | Strong |
| BJP | 144 | 30.51% | 2 | 337 | Average |
| BSP | 43 | 9.11% | 3 | 71 | Poor |
| INC | 41 | 8.69% | 4 | 139 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 2.97% | 5 | 31 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.42% | 7 | 155 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.42% | 6 | 36 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.21% | 11 | 154 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 301 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 171 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 162 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.