izk0fo0 csyk[kkjk d0ua01 PS 312
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP413 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 413 | 61.64% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 198 | 29.55% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 29 | 4.33% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 7 | 1.04% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 7 | 1.04% | |
| 6 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | Phoolchandra | CM | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 670 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 413 | 61.19% | 1 | 42 | Strong |
| BJP | 198 | 29.33% | 2 | 271 | Average |
| INC | 29 | 4.30% | 3 | 217 | Poor |
| IND | 14 | 2.07% | 4 | 30 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.04% | 5 | 283 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.74% | 6 | 37 | Poor |
| CM | 2 | 0.30% | 7 | 62 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 103 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 165 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 363 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 374 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.