izk0fo0 jktkiqj d0ua01 PS 311
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP463 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 463 | 65.49% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 148 | 20.93% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 49 | 6.93% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 28 | 3.96% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 5 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 7 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 707 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 463 | 64.66% | 1 | 26 | Strong |
| BJP | 148 | 20.67% | 2 | 334 | Weak |
| BSP | 49 | 6.84% | 3 | 55 | Poor |
| INC | 28 | 3.91% | 4 | 228 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 1.40% | 5 | 73 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.56% | 6 | 72 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.42% | 7 | 106 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 164 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 160 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 371 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 348 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.