izk0fo0 lSnuiqj d0ua0 2 PS 308
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP313 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 313 | 71.46% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 73 | 16.67% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 26 | 5.94% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 13 | 2.97% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 10 | 2.28% | |
| 6 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 438 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 313 | 69.25% | 1 | 118 | Strong |
| SP | 73 | 16.15% | 2 | 379 | Weak |
| INC | 26 | 5.75% | 3 | 245 | Poor |
| BSP | 13 | 2.88% | 4 | 210 | Poor |
| JAP | 10 | 2.21% | 5 | 26 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.44% | 6 | 76 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 298 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 361 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 403 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 369 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 345 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.