izk0fo0 iqjok fi.MkSj d0ua01 PS 302
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP304 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 304 | 45.04% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 196 | 29.04% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 91 | 13.48% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 69 | 10.22% | |
| 5 | Phoolchandra | CM | 4 | 0.59% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 675 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 304 | 44.71% | 1 | 125 | Strong |
| SP | 196 | 28.82% | 2 | 221 | Average |
| BSP | 91 | 13.38% | 3 | 13 | Weak |
| INC | 69 | 10.15% | 4 | 43 | Weak |
| IND | 7 | 1.03% | 5 | 138 | Poor |
| CM | 4 | 0.59% | 6 | 9 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.29% | 7 | 70 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 228 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 161 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 387 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 340 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.