izk0fo0 igkMiqj ejnkuiqj d0l02 PS 3
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP305 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 305 | 47.81% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 295 | 46.24% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 15 | 2.35% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 10 | 1.57% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 5 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 7 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 638 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 305 | 47.51% | 1 | 99 | Strong |
| BJP | 295 | 45.95% | 2 | 141 | Strong |
| BSP | 15 | 2.34% | 3 | 186 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 1.56% | 4 | 359 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.78% | 5 | 178 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.78% | 6 | 59 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 225 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 93 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 84 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 182 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 129 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.