tw0gk0 'kadjxat eusg: d0ua02 PS 298
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP285 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 285 | 51.91% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 127 | 23.13% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 85 | 15.48% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 25 | 4.55% | |
| 5 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 5 | 0.91% | |
| 6 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 7 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 8 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 11 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 12 | Phoolchandra | CM | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 13 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.18% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 549 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 285 | 50.80% | 1 | 154 | Strong |
| SP | 127 | 22.64% | 2 | 314 | Weak |
| BSP | 85 | 15.15% | 3 | 16 | Weak |
| INC | 25 | 4.46% | 4 | 253 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.96% | 5 | 63 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.71% | 6 | 70 | Poor |
| ABAD | 4 | 0.71% | 7 | 11 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.53% | 8 | 27 | Poor |
| CM | 2 | 0.36% | 9 | 58 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.36% | 10 | 34 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.18% | 11 | 227 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.