izk0fo0 fcuksgjk d0ua02 PS 295
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP260 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 260 | 46.26% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 257 | 45.73% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 19 | 3.38% | |
| 4 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 8 | 1.42% | |
| 5 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 7 | 1.25% | |
| 6 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 562 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 260 | 46.10% | 1 | 150 | Strong |
| BJP | 257 | 45.57% | 2 | 191 | Strong |
| INC | 19 | 3.37% | 3 | 290 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.95% | 4 | 62 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.24% | 5 | 282 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.53% | 6 | 102 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 199 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.35% | 8 | 74 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 154 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 363 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 336 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.