izk0fo0 e/kqiqjh d0ua01 PS 290
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP184 votes at this polling station
over Mo. Ashraf (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 184 | 32.51% | |
| 2 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 174 | 30.74% | |
| 3 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 136 | 24.03% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 53 | 9.36% | |
| 5 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 5 | 0.88% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 8 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 9 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 10 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 12 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 14 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 566 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 184 | 32.17% | 1 | 291 | Average |
| BSP | 174 | 30.42% | 2 | 1 | Average |
| SP | 136 | 23.78% | 3 | 299 | Weak |
| INC | 53 | 9.27% | 4 | 79 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 1.75% | 5 | 71 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.35% | 9 | 32 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.35% | 6 | 197 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 72 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.35% | 8 | 67 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 144 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 368 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.