izk0fo0 csgVk[kqnZ d0ua02 PS 286
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP266 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 266 | 44.11% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 265 | 43.95% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 32 | 5.31% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 17 | 2.82% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 6 | Phoolchandra | CM | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 10 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 13 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 14 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 603 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 266 | 43.32% | 1 | 177 | Strong |
| SP | 265 | 43.16% | 2 | 144 | Strong |
| INC | 32 | 5.21% | 3 | 191 | Poor |
| BSP | 17 | 2.77% | 4 | 178 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.79% | 5 | 60 | Poor |
| AAP | 5 | 0.81% | 6 | 35 | Poor |
| CM | 3 | 0.49% | 7 | 19 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.33% | 8 | 65 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 101 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 225 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 366 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.