izk0fo0 tjkSyk d0ua01 PS 279
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP462 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 462 | 62.18% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 189 | 25.44% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 49 | 6.59% | |
| 4 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 12 | 1.62% | |
| 5 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 11 | 1.48% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 8 | 1.08% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 5 | 0.67% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 14 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 743 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 462 | 61.35% | 1 | 27 | Strong |
| BJP | 189 | 25.10% | 2 | 282 | Average |
| BSP | 49 | 6.51% | 3 | 54 | Poor |
| IND | 26 | 3.45% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 1.46% | 5 | 357 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.27% | 6 | 69 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 147 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.13% | 7 | 292 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 140 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 99 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 361 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.