izk0fo0 pdyksnhiqj d0ua01 PS 265
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP355 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 355 | 51.37% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 250 | 36.18% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 34 | 4.92% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 26 | 3.76% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 8 | 1.16% | |
| 6 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 8 | 1.16% | |
| 7 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 10 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 691 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 355 | 50.43% | 1 | 72 | Strong |
| BJP | 250 | 35.51% | 2 | 201 | Average |
| INC | 34 | 4.83% | 3 | 180 | Poor |
| BSP | 26 | 3.69% | 4 | 121 | Poor |
| AAP | 8 | 1.14% | 5 | 8 | Poor |
| JAP | 8 | 1.14% | 6 | 41 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 0.85% | 7 | 165 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 65 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 145 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 91 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 350 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.