tw0gk0 :ikeÅ d0ua0 2 PS 261
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP329 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 329 | 47.27% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 254 | 36.49% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 45 | 6.47% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 41 | 5.89% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 11 | 1.58% | |
| 6 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 7 | 1.01% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 13 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 696 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 329 | 46.73% | 1 | 86 | Strong |
| BJP | 254 | 36.08% | 2 | 195 | Average |
| INC | 45 | 6.39% | 3 | 117 | Poor |
| BSP | 41 | 5.82% | 4 | 78 | Poor |
| JAP | 11 | 1.56% | 5 | 22 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 0.99% | 7 | 132 | Poor |
| AAP | 7 | 0.99% | 6 | 16 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 135 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 90 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 356 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 343 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.