tw0gk0 :ikeÅ d0ua0 1 PS 260
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP360 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 360 | 54.88% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 212 | 32.32% | |
| 3 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 30 | 4.57% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 21 | 3.20% | |
| 5 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 21 | 3.20% | |
| 6 | Phoolchandra | CM | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 8 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 656 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 360 | 54.55% | 1 | 66 | Strong |
| SP | 212 | 32.12% | 2 | 203 | Average |
| JAP | 30 | 4.55% | 3 | 6 | Poor |
| BSP | 21 | 3.18% | 4 | 146 | Poor |
| INC | 21 | 3.18% | 5 | 276 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.76% | 6 | 195 | Poor |
| CM | 3 | 0.45% | 7 | 18 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 27 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 286 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 143 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 355 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.