iw0ek0fo0 jkgh d0ua01 PS 249
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP319 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 319 | 50.24% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 221 | 34.80% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 55 | 8.66% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 24 | 3.78% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 635 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 319 | 49.23% | 1 | 108 | Strong |
| SP | 221 | 34.10% | 2 | 189 | Average |
| BSP | 55 | 8.49% | 3 | 43 | Poor |
| INC | 24 | 3.70% | 4 | 258 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.23% | 5 | 107 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.46% | 6 | 99 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.31% | 7 | 62 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.31% | 8 | 56 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 132 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 312 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 379 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.