iapk;r?kj bczzkfgeiqj d0ua01 PS 245
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP411 votes at this polling station
over Radhe Shyam (JAP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 411 | 56.22% | |
| 2 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 154 | 21.07% | |
| 3 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 94 | 12.86% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 28 | 3.83% | |
| 5 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 23 | 3.15% | |
| 6 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 6 | 0.82% | |
| 7 | Raghvendra | HSP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | Phoolchandra | CM | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 13 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 731 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 411 | 55.32% | 1 | 28 | Strong |
| JAP | 154 | 20.73% | 2 | 1 | Weak |
| SP | 94 | 12.65% | 3 | 358 | Weak |
| BSP | 28 | 3.77% | 4 | 114 | Poor |
| INC | 23 | 3.10% | 5 | 264 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 1.48% | 6 | 57 | Poor |
| HSP | 4 | 0.54% | 7 | 4 | Poor |
| CM | 2 | 0.27% | 10 | 44 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.27% | 8 | 59 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 55 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 378 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.