izk0fo0 efVgk d0ua03 PS 243
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP393 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 393 | 44.41% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 378 | 42.71% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 46 | 5.20% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 35 | 3.95% | |
| 5 | Suryanath | AK | 7 | 0.79% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 7 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 4 | 0.45% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 3 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 3 | 0.34% | |
| 11 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.23% | |
| 13 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.11% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.11% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 885 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 393 | 44.26% | 1 | 51 | Strong |
| BJP | 378 | 42.57% | 2 | 46 | Strong |
| INC | 46 | 5.18% | 3 | 111 | Poor |
| BSP | 35 | 3.94% | 4 | 96 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 1.69% | 5 | 23 | Poor |
| AK | 7 | 0.79% | 6 | 4 | Poor |
| JAP | 4 | 0.45% | 7 | 77 | Poor |
| ABAD | 3 | 0.34% | 8 | 25 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.23% | 9 | 187 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.11% | 10 | 131 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.11% | 11 | 85 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.