dk;kZy; [k.M fodkl vf/k0 jkgh d0ua02 PS 233
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP242 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 242 | 55.50% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 123 | 28.21% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 58 | 13.30% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 11 | 2.52% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 6 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 7 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 436 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 242 | 55.25% | 1 | 211 | Strong |
| SP | 123 | 28.08% | 2 | 319 | Average |
| INC | 58 | 13.24% | 3 | 66 | Weak |
| BSP | 11 | 2.51% | 4 | 228 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.23% | 5 | 279 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.23% | 6 | 134 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 342 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 401 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 352 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 336 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 303 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.