jkt0ck0b0dkyst d0ua03 PS 222
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP197 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 197 | 49.37% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 129 | 32.33% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 63 | 15.79% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 6 | 1.50% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 6 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 7 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 399 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 197 | 49.13% | 1 | 273 | Strong |
| SP | 129 | 32.17% | 2 | 306 | Average |
| INC | 63 | 15.71% | 3 | 56 | Weak |
| BSP | 6 | 1.50% | 4 | 298 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.50% | 5 | 315 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.25% | 6 | 274 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 127 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 294 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 332 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 324 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 345 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.