jkt0ck0b0dkyst d0ua01 PS 220
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP368 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 368 | 67.40% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 101 | 18.50% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 71 | 13.00% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 5 | 0.92% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 6 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 546 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 368 | 66.91% | 1 | 55 | Strong |
| SP | 101 | 18.36% | 2 | 351 | Weak |
| INC | 71 | 12.91% | 3 | 39 | Weak |
| BSP | 5 | 0.91% | 4 | 309 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 5 | 273 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 330 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 322 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 394 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 343 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 325 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 292 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.