izk0fo0 ?kwjkMhg d0ua02 PS 22
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP341 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Manish Chauhan (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 341 | 74.95% | |
| 2 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 82 | 18.02% | |
| 3 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 15 | 3.30% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 8 | 1.76% | |
| 5 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 6 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 7 | Phoolchandra | CM | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 455 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 341 | 73.81% | 1 | 81 | Strong |
| INC | 82 | 17.75% | 2 | 23 | Weak |
| SP | 15 | 3.25% | 3 | 402 | Poor |
| BSP | 8 | 1.73% | 4 | 254 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.08% | 5 | 179 | Poor |
| CM | 2 | 0.43% | 6 | 32 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 165 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 100 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 195 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 139 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 324 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.