ds0fo0 xksjk cktkj d0ua04 PS 215
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP194 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 194 | 49.11% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 139 | 35.19% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 30 | 7.59% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 21 | 5.32% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 5 | 1.27% | |
| 6 | Suryanath | AK | 4 | 1.01% | |
| 7 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 9 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 395 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 194 | 48.62% | 1 | 225 | Strong |
| BJP | 139 | 34.84% | 2 | 343 | Average |
| INC | 30 | 7.52% | 3 | 204 | Poor |
| BSP | 21 | 5.26% | 4 | 145 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 1.25% | 5 | 64 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 1.00% | 6 | 7 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 272 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.25% | 8 | 148 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 392 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 320 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 287 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.