ds0fo0 xksjk cktkj d0ua02 PS 213
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP382 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 382 | 64.64% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 134 | 22.67% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 71 | 12.01% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 5 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 6 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 591 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 382 | 64.09% | 1 | 43 | Strong |
| SP | 134 | 22.48% | 2 | 303 | Weak |
| INC | 71 | 11.91% | 3 | 38 | Weak |
| BSP | 3 | 0.50% | 4 | 345 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.17% | 5 | 126 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 285 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 390 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 337 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 374 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 324 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 317 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.