izk0fo0 ?kwjkMhg d0ua01 PS 21
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP337 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Manish Chauhan (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 337 | 57.90% | |
| 2 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 202 | 34.71% | |
| 3 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 18 | 3.09% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 9 | 1.55% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 6 | 1.03% | |
| 6 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 582 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 337 | 57.51% | 1 | 86 | Strong |
| INC | 202 | 34.47% | 2 | 1 | Average |
| SP | 18 | 3.07% | 3 | 401 | Poor |
| BSP | 9 | 1.54% | 4 | 247 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.02% | 6 | 150 | Poor |
| AAP | 6 | 1.02% | 5 | 18 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 120 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 99 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 83 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 138 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 194 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.