izk0fo0 xksjk cktkj d0ua02 PS 200
Ram Pratap Yadav
SPSP379 votes at this polling station
over Aditi Singh (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 379 | 54.61% | |
| 2 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 212 | 30.55% | |
| 3 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 46 | 6.63% | |
| 4 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 44 | 6.34% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 6 | 0.86% | |
| 6 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 694 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 379 | 54.45% | 1 | 61 | Strong |
| BJP | 212 | 30.46% | 2 | 247 | Average |
| BSP | 46 | 6.61% | 3 | 63 | Poor |
| INC | 44 | 6.32% | 4 | 121 | Poor |
| AAP | 6 | 0.86% | 5 | 22 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.57% | 6 | 222 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.29% | 7 | 143 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 146 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 311 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 308 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 276 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.