izk0fo0 :dquiqj d0ua01 PS 20
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP272 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 272 | 40.66% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 262 | 39.16% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 61 | 9.12% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 36 | 5.38% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 6 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 7 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 8 | 1.20% | |
| 8 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 10 | Raghvendra | HSP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 11 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 12 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 13 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 14 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 669 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 272 | 40.18% | 1 | 168 | Strong |
| SP | 262 | 38.70% | 2 | 147 | Average |
| INC | 61 | 9.01% | 3 | 59 | Poor |
| BSP | 36 | 5.32% | 4 | 90 | Poor |
| IND | 15 | 2.22% | 5 | 21 | Poor |
| JAP | 8 | 1.18% | 7 | 38 | Poor |
| AAP | 8 | 1.18% | 6 | 5 | Poor |
| ABAD | 3 | 0.44% | 8 | 17 | Poor |
| HSP | 2 | 0.30% | 9 | 11 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 90 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 82 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.