izk0fo0 cj[kkiqj d0ua0 1 PS 170
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP440 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 440 | 71.43% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 73 | 11.85% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 49 | 7.95% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 25 | 4.06% | |
| 5 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 18 | 2.92% | |
| 6 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 5 | 0.81% | |
| 7 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 616 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 440 | 70.51% | 1 | 20 | Strong |
| SP | 73 | 11.70% | 2 | 377 | Weak |
| INC | 49 | 7.85% | 3 | 95 | Poor |
| BSP | 25 | 4.01% | 4 | 124 | Poor |
| JAP | 18 | 2.88% | 5 | 10 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.28% | 6 | 106 | Poor |
| ABAD | 2 | 0.32% | 7 | 53 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 262 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 289 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 288 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 249 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.