vk'khZokn b.Vj dkyst 'kfDr uxj d0ua0 2 PS 166
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP227 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 227 | 44.42% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 160 | 31.31% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 71 | 13.89% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 46 | 9.00% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 6 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 7 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 8 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 511 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 227 | 44.16% | 1 | 233 | Strong |
| SP | 160 | 31.13% | 2 | 265 | Average |
| INC | 71 | 13.81% | 3 | 37 | Weak |
| BSP | 46 | 8.95% | 4 | 62 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.39% | 6 | 306 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.39% | 5 | 169 | Poor |
| ABAD | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 140 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 200 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 116 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 245 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 285 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.