izk0fo0 Hkqokiqj dyka d0ua01 PS 15
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP471 votes at this polling station
over Ram Pratap Yadav (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 471 | 74.76% | |
| 2 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 118 | 18.73% | |
| 3 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 16 | 2.54% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 13 | 2.06% | |
| 5 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 6 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 7 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 8 | Phoolchandra | CM | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Raghvendra | HSP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Suryanath | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 630 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 471 | 73.94% | 1 | 10 | Strong |
| SP | 118 | 18.52% | 2 | 325 | Weak |
| INC | 16 | 2.51% | 3 | 309 | Poor |
| BSP | 13 | 2.04% | 4 | 207 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.10% | 5 | 115 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.31% | 6 | 147 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 163 | Poor |
| CM | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 79 | Poor |
| HSP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 48 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 208 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 191 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.