vkpk;Z f}osnh b.Vj dkyst d0ua01 PS 142
Aditi Singh
BJPBJP324 votes at this polling station
over Dr. Manish Chauhan (INC)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aditi Singh | BJP | 324 | 69.83% | |
| 2 | Dr. Manish Chauhan | INC | 66 | 14.22% | |
| 3 | Ram Pratap Yadav | SP | 64 | 13.79% | |
| 4 | Mo. Ashraf | BSP | 8 | 1.72% | |
| 5 | Gaurav Singh | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 6 | Suryanath | AK | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 7 | Kuldeep Yadav | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Mahmood Ahmad | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Ram Bahadur | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Sartaj Ali | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Phoolchandra | CM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mansingh Patel | ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Raghvendra | HSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Radhe Shyam | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 464 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 324 | 69.08% | 1 | 97 | Strong |
| INC | 66 | 14.07% | 2 | 51 | Weak |
| SP | 64 | 13.65% | 3 | 386 | Weak |
| BSP | 8 | 1.71% | 4 | 261 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 5 | 254 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 119 | Poor |
| ABAD | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 277 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 370 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 295 | Poor |
| CM | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 267 | Poor |
| HSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 226 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 180, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.